Welcome To Aberdeen & District Pool League

  Create An Account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Stats  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10 July 20, 2018  

  Login
Nickname


Password


>> Register <<

  Main Menu

  Who's Online
There are currently, 91 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.



You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here.



  Last Seen
Al: 12 hours, 43 minutes ago
Steve85: 21 hours, 57 minutes ago
jamesbredon: 1 day, 5 hours, 44 minutes ago
dobbin247: 1 day, 20 hours, 52 minutes ago
wordprax: 2 days ago
martin2479: 4 days ago
bespoketailor: 7 days ago
balitek: 7 days ago
huangjian123: 8 days ago
fundmybizness: 8 days ago
latinamruitment: 10 days ago
chenjinyan: 10 days ago
boyle199: 11 days ago
willardboyle19: 15 days ago
furrybeast: 16 days ago
SharleenJoy: 17 days ago
AaronEckhart: 18 days ago
yahoosupport4: 18 days ago
naukritodayindia: 18 days ago
tnpscnews: 18 days ago
teaultimate: 22 days ago
himalayan-yoga: 22 days ago
doyle212: 24 days ago
lovevashikaran456: 26 days ago
careertabloid: 27 days ago
wigs248: 28 days ago
allitexpert: 29 days ago
rosesandra: 29 days ago
briannakevin: 29 days ago
madisonbella: 29 days ago

General
Topic: reputations had been wounded


Moderated By: ChrisL, a_j_scott
Aberdeen & District Pool League Forum Index
  »» General
    »» reputations had been wounded

Please Register To Post


Author reputations had been wounded

wigs248
Just popping in
Joined: 21-Jun-2018
Posts: 1


blank    avatar

posticon   Posted: 2018-06-21 22:28

Newspapers ran story when story on our series, and right commentators waged battle on behalf of church leaders World Health Organization believed their reputations had been wounded. Notably, not one survivor of domestic abuse was interviewed or asked for associate degree opinion.
Worried that the testimonies of the ladies would be yelled down, we tend to wrote a chunk explaining our approach, our sources, our (correct) citation of Dr Tracy, and our in depth interviews, and printed it as a guide to the analysis — however no critics in public named it.Then, into the fray waded prof W Bradford Wilcox, the Director of the National wedding Project from the University of Virginia, World Health Organization had been cited in a very footnote to at least one of prof Tracy's articles. He wasn't quoted or named in our piece, however he persisted.
"The ABC's report by Julia Baird and Hayley Gleeson on faith and violence has come back underneath serious hearth, and permanently reason," he wrote.We were "blaming Australian churches for a giant violence problem", he said, and that we ought to have used yank analysis from the Nineteen Nineties. Instead, he urged, "what could also be happening" is that churches cut back abuse.
(Unfortunately, there's meagre proof for this; nevertheless, once Noemi Priest, a scientist from the Harvard college of Public Health at the Australian National University, explained why, she was bluntly ignored). And by the sidelines, the ladies World Health Organization had scraped along the courageousness to inform their stories weekday mute once more, unheard, and surprised.
The fact that we tend to reportable that psychologists and survivors say the philosophy of headship — that a person is to be the pinnacle of the lady, as Christ was head of the church, and a girl is to (voluntarily) undergo his authority — is usually twisted by husbands to justify abuse, was seen as a right away attack on church authority, and a covert feminist agenda.
Again, prof Wilcox didn't cite a word from one lady, nor one victim of abuse. Why interview specialists and survivors, he thundered, after we ought to have "worked with serious students to conduct quantitative, across the nation representative research"? Polls, data, figures, and statistics — not words and witnesses! however there's none in Australia.The core question was this: Is qualitative analysis enough to reveal or tackle a big social issue? within the absence of exhausting information, ought to journalists refuse to report till somebody is ready to conduct a poll? Is yank analysis on 1992 information additional relevant than quite two hundred modern accounts?
And why had the church not fazed to conduct their own research; even worse, to listen to the inculpatory , imperative reports languishing in some back space in associate degree recent hospital in Melbourne?
google

[ This message was edited by: wigs248 on 2018-06-21 22:31 ]



  Member Information For wigs248Profile   Send Private Message To wigs248PM   Go To wigs248's Website   Quote And Reply To This MessageQuote

Member Messages

Search & Navigation


 

Log in to check your private messages



Please Login Or Register





  


 

[ Advanced Search ]

Jump To Forum: 


All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest 2004 CML Web Design. All rights reserved.
This site is built using MyPHPNuke.

Site designed by CML Web Design

Page took 0.026513 seconds to load.