| Author |
The ADPL affiliation |
|
thebigdog
Just can't stay away Joined: 28-Jan-2010 Posts: 74
|
Posted: 2010-02-08 19:51
I fancy a debate so lets get it started,
|
|
paulk
Quite a regular Joined: 27-Jan-2009 Posts: 48
From: stonehaven
|
Posted: 2010-02-08 20:23
Debates are great mate but i prefer them with people who i respect or at least accept their opinions you however fall into neither of these categories!!!
|
|
furrybeast
Home away from home Joined: 11-Oct-2004 Posts: 4580
From: Aberdeen
|
Posted: 2010-02-09 11:13
|
|
derek
Home away from home Joined: 13-Jan-2010 Posts: 590
|
Posted: 2010-02-09 11:37
On 2010-02-09 11:13 , furrybeast Wrote:WOW !!!! Can't wait haven't been to Butlins since I was four.
|
|
furrybeast
Home away from home Joined: 11-Oct-2004 Posts: 4580
From: Aberdeen
|
Posted: 2010-02-09 11:56
Was it not still an army camp then?  Good memories though - first snog, learned to swim, candy floss and fresh peaches, prawns and buckies in wee tubs, shitting yourself on the chairlift for the first time, donkey derby's, knobbly knees, roller skating til your feet bled, "are we there yet!" *sigh!* now those WERE the days 
|
|
Blue_Jam
Home away from home Joined: 12-Jun-2007 Posts: 151
|
Posted: 2010-02-09 12:10
Wow, around 1,000 players for the weekend, pretty impressive.
I've just come back from a weekend away so catching up on the posts and seems like a lot of contradictions cropping up; Don't want to regularly play against the best players in Scotland but do want to play against the best players in England once a year. Don't want to play Blackball cause it's all just about attacking/potting but think a 40 minute tactical frame in the later stages of a big money BB event is also a bad thing?
If the decision of ADPL affiliation if being made in the interests of the majority of players then SPA is the best choice. More of our players will get to compete with the best in Scotland on a regular basis in the IM tour (the real jewel in the crown) and we could send
|
|
Blue_Jam
Home away from home Joined: 12-Jun-2007 Posts: 151
|
Posted: 2010-02-09 12:12
around 30 players down to two county events every year that put the interleague to shame. Seems very counter-productive to base the decision in the interests of the very few who are willing and able to go to the WR International events.
I'd like to know why players reps at SPA meetings have voted in the past to keep the rule choice in place, anyone asked this question or know the answer?
|
|
Snakeyes
Home away from home Joined: 06-Oct-2004 Posts: 514
From: Aberdeen
|
Posted: 2010-02-09 12:20
On 2010-02-09 12:10 , Blue_Jam Wrote:!!! QUOTE !!! More of our players will get to compete with the best in Scotland on a regular basis in the IM tour (the real jewel in the crown) and we could send I have read on the SPA site that its actually the Corner Pocket Tour that has all the creme de la creme playing and not the IM!! ----------------- Your mouth's writing cheques your talent can't cash!
|
|
Blue_Jam
Home away from home Joined: 12-Jun-2007 Posts: 151
|
Posted: 2010-02-09 12:47
The IM is the official ranking system and has hundreds of players with local qualifying to get to the finals so it's the form players that make it.
Corner Pocket doesn't have qualifiers and is open to anyone willing to pay to enter and a much smaller field. Having said that it's choc full of brilliant players (no big names miss out to an off day qualifying) so it would be hard to call either way
|
|
cab
Just can't stay away Joined: 14-Jan-2010 Posts: 113
From: United Kingdom
|
Posted: 2010-02-09 13:16
Quote: Blue_Jam
If the decision of ADPL affiliation if being made in the interests of the majority of players then SPA is the best choice. More of our players will get to compete with the best in Scotland on a regular basis in the IM tour (the real jewel in the crown) and we could send around 30 players down to two county events every year that put the interleague to shame. Seems very counter-productive to base the decision in the interests of the very few who are willing and able to go to the WR International events.
+++++ These are not the County events, they are the Super League events 11 person teams. The Counties (15 person teams ) will be later in the year (much bigger event). There will be an A and B event, and as long as you enter ONE A team, you can enter more than one B team. See thread on SPA, Dunfermline have One at CT and Five at PB. So you will be able to field a lot more than 30 players.
|
|
Snakeyes
Home away from home Joined: 06-Oct-2004 Posts: 514
From: Aberdeen
|
Posted: 2010-02-09 17:03
Ssssshhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!! It's awful quiet for a change!! lol
|
|
Macleod00
Home away from home Joined: 08-Oct-2008 Posts: 297
From: The North
|
Posted: 2010-02-09 19:28
!!! QUOTE !!! I have read on the SPA site that its actually the Corner Pocket Tour that has all the creme de la creme playing and not the IM!! Modest bugger...
|
|
Macleod00
Home away from home Joined: 08-Oct-2008 Posts: 297
From: The North
|
Posted: 2010-02-09 19:42
!!! QUOTE !!! Don't want to regularly play against the best players in Scotland but do want to play against the best players in England once a year. Andy, most players up here do want to play against the best players in Scotland regularly, of course they do. Over time, I expect that they will - once the SPA ditches the ironically named CHOICE policy. Also, its not the best players in England its the best (both amateur and professional) players in the world. There is a difference. !!! QUOTE !!! Don't want to play Blackball cause it's all just about attacking/potting but think a 40 minute tactical frame in the later stages of a big money BB event is also a bad thing? I think the part that folk have found bizarre, rather than the frames duration, was the use of the 'soft break'. I found it quite fascinating but can see how some may view it as appalling pool...
|
|
thebigdog
Just can't stay away Joined: 28-Jan-2010 Posts: 74
|
Posted: 2010-02-11 17:33
Could the adpl not make some sort of deal with the SPA to allow the former sepf players to keep there own international identity to be able to play in the WR champs in blackpool
|
|
furrybeast
Home away from home Joined: 11-Oct-2004 Posts: 4580
From: Aberdeen
|
Posted: 2010-02-11 17:36
They have already said they are quite happy for our players to still take part in the WEPF worlds.
Problem is, they have to qualify for the team which would mean tours or trialling
|
|
thebigdog
Just can't stay away Joined: 28-Jan-2010 Posts: 74
|
Posted: 2010-02-11 17:47
Could they not play them to BB rules
|
|
furrybeast
Home away from home Joined: 11-Oct-2004 Posts: 4580
From: Aberdeen
|
Posted: 2010-02-11 17:53
Not beyond the realms of possibility I suppose
|
|
Macleod00
Home away from home Joined: 08-Oct-2008 Posts: 297
From: The North
|
Posted: 2010-02-11 18:00
!!! QUOTE !!! They have already said they are quite happy for our players to still take part in the WEPF worlds.
Problem is, they have to qualify for the team which would mean tours or trialling Surely the biggest f**k you to George Harwood (on behalf of SPA/Mcinnes) would be for Scotland to start winning WEPF events regularly. The BB game could still be grown in tandem, building on the good work that has already been done in Scotland... Its the majority that rules according to the flying Scotsman... With this (and their choice policy) in mind, do you think that the SPA Membership are bonkers?
|
|
derek
Home away from home Joined: 13-Jan-2010 Posts: 590
|
Posted: 2010-02-11 19:59
On 2010-02-11 18:00 , Macleod00 Wrote:!!! QUOTE !!! !!! QUOTE !!! They have already said they are quite happy for our players to still take part in the WEPF worlds.
Problem is, they have to qualify for the team which would mean tours or trialling
Surely the biggest f**k you to George Harwood (on behalf of SPA/Mcinnes) would be for Scotland to start winning WEPF events regularly. The BB game could still be grown in tandem, building on the good work that has already been done in Scotland...
Its the majority that rules according to the flying Scotsman... With this (and their choice policy) in mind, do you think that the SPA Membership are bonkers?
Adam, George Harwood is totally committed to the SEPF and Scotland. He has taken his time to come up and chair the AGM and I am pretty sure if he hadn't there would be even more hassle and the federation would have probably folded. I know from my own opinion I would not of gone back on the commitee had it not been for George Hawood's involvement.Over the past 12-15 years Scotland have been majorly represented at all events. And until maybe laterly even now the Majority of players were from the league that is now possibly going to shaft them the ADPL. Not very fair in my opinion and many others.
|
|
Macleod00
Home away from home Joined: 08-Oct-2008 Posts: 297
From: The North
|
Posted: 2010-02-11 20:31
!!! QUOTE !!! Adam,
George Harwood is totally committed to the SEPF and Scotland. He has taken his time to come up and chair the AGM and I am pretty sure if he hadn't there would be even more hassle and the federation would have probably folded. I know from my own opinion I would not of gone back on the commitee had it not been for George Hawood's involvement.Over the past 12-15 years Scotland have been majorly represented at all events. And until maybe laterly even now the Majority of players were from the league that is now possibly going to shaft them the ADPL. Not very fair in my opinion and many others. Rather than advocating SPA affiliation, my post was questioning the strategy of SPA to date. It seems to me, from reading a good deal of Mcinness' posts, that he/the SPA are hiding behind statements like 'we differ over the rules' etc. It seems clear that he/they have a problem with George Harwood and I wish this would be admitted! If (as Furry said above) it has been ok'd for current SEPF players to still qualify for WEPF events if the ADPL affiliates then this exposes the idiocy of their policies to date. In my view, of course...
|